Fast Tracks

Model Railroading Discussion Forums

Return To The Fast Tracks Website

The Fast Tracks discussion forums have been closed. Click Here for more information.

It is currently Thu Mar 28, 2024 2:31 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 5 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Sep 04, 2009 6:08 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 4:08 pm
Posts: 2
What is the turnout radius of a #6 turnout, and how can it be calculated for each size turnout in On3 gauge?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 04, 2009 10:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2005 10:48 am
Posts: 365
Location: East Texas - USA
The only radius that's accurate is the closure rail radius, which is not the same as the substitution radius. The closure radius represents the minimum radius through the turnout. There is a simple method and an advanced trig method. The accurate method is the trig, but the simple formula method is within +/- 0.034% accurate - which is close enough in modeling terms.

Note: NMRA tables in the RP 12.x series, use a compressed geometry with curved points, and with slightly shortened leads, thus the results are a bit different

Simple Lead and Closure Radius Calculation for Straight Turnouts: (This does not work for curved turnouts).
n= frog number
g= gauge in inches
R= radius of closure rail center line

R= 2*g*(square(n))
Length of Lead = Square Root(2*R*g)

Thus for number 6:
N=6
R=(2*36*36)
R= 2592” / 48 = 54” radius of closure

Square Root(2*2592*36)
Square Root(186,624)
Lead= 432” / 48 = 9”

Note Further: The formulas are dependent only on the frog number and the gauge. Then use the scale ratio for the modeling value. These formulas are very accurate even for full size prototype and are very close to the AREA diagrams (which use the Trig methods for greater accuracy).

I can also provide the trig formulas if the accuracy is necessary for say a CAD projection.

-ed-

_________________
-ed mccamey-
COSLAR RR - http://www.coslar.us/
NMRA Standards and Conformance Department
PROTO & FINE Scale Coordinator
I estimate I have about 5 pounds of coupler springs somewhere in the vicinity of my workbench.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Sep 05, 2009 6:25 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 4:08 pm
Posts: 2
Thank you for the information. I now have a starting point.

Steve


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 14, 2014 8:54 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2014 8:12 pm
Posts: 1
I tried to use your formula to work out the radius of a #5 point and failed miserably. Well, I never was good at maths. I'm modelling a line which had minimum curve radius as small as 2 chain (33" scale) so I would like points which are no smaller a radius than that. Which one would be the best to choose? :?:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 16, 2014 5:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2005 10:48 am
Posts: 365
Location: East Texas - USA
For On3 (36" gauge - not On30):
Frog_____Lead_____Closure Radius
4.75____7.125"____33.844"
5______7.5"_______37.5"
5.5_____8.25"_____45.375"
6_______9"_______54"

I have a nice spreadsheet that allows 'what if' calculations using the formulas shown in the thread above.
-ed-

_________________
-ed mccamey-
COSLAR RR - http://www.coslar.us/
NMRA Standards and Conformance Department
PROTO & FINE Scale Coordinator
I estimate I have about 5 pounds of coupler springs somewhere in the vicinity of my workbench.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 5 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group